Inside goals

The wealth of the social state is powerful in a sense unexplained by the German election. A hint is that German economic prospects have risen with Merkel's election. The south has become more resistive to the claims industry and the northern mining towns are illustrative by their local flavour. I suggest the winner is less important than the contest, and the wealth of intrinsic understanding is biased in its approach to society.

The politics has been all conservative, but we must remember Merkel is from the east. The regions suggest to a political scientist that society is becoming more independent and less institutional. The sociologist would look at the northern towns by the sea for example Kiel and the sea shore.

The real local flavour to the British is the social understanding Merkel represents with the east, and the regions are left out of this equation. Globalisation has made Merkel front page talk and the articles in my blog emphasise the politics of local authority, and the central disquiet over its loss of significance. The external world is therefore optimistic about German reform, and soundbites like a German growth pattern undermine the sense in Anglo-German relations.

The social state is likely to change if Merkel is elected, the political democracy is non-aligned at the  instant of changing its leader. This means globalisation is not German and western as well as democratic. The inside of Germany s becoming more western, not eastern. The reason is the glasnost revisited by Putin's influence in Germany. The state is objective in its approach to the eastern menace, but in German minds, the reform is idealistic in Merkel's plan.

The westernisation of the threat is no longer viable in its interpretation and its measure. The rebooting of eastern democracy and the education process will produce model westerners and politics is no longer what it was. The Cold War is taking on new interpretation and the social security state a measure of austerity. New business orientations are less than favourable, and the wealth of industry taking shelter.

German foreign policy is more of a task for BBC viewers, it is sidelined between British and Russian approaches to international diplomacy and Obama has restricted its domestic audience. The ideology of the west is a advantage to German foreign policy and military approaches receive a large audience. The politics of the UK is particularly Prime Ministerial, but foreign policy Obama threatened is easier for German businesses to support.

Of course we did not, and the reach of Africa seems large in British newsrooms. The difficulty is Germany does not understand this issue apparently, and the growth of economic unitary policy is defending the reverse of bias to the right.  The German analysis is difficult without a domestic view of German history, but my readers can enter into the spirit of the German political background.