The politics in Europe

The state of Washington was on strike last week, the country laughed at its President and Congress appeared to win the public backing. The real story is very different, ideology started to infiltrate the House of Representatives and the President needed to quell public disquiet. The figures of Afghanistan are not looking as predicted and the foreign policy against Russia is losing head way, as Syria gain enters the headlines. How does a President explain a climbdown, well Obama chose the Washington machine.

The politics seems obscure like our approach to any foreign country, but to bring in the public of American foreign policy is a complex task. Firstly each country interprets it differently and I suggest each country has a tailored message because of the real attempt to interpret foreign cultures. The globalisation is therefore much exaggerated and economic dependency is more American than eastern. The foreign policy is of course the same, and policy fails to match political or economic approaches. It is about politics and the problems of the Whitehouse machine.

The atlantic strike is therefore on our televisions, and Obama is portrayed differently in Washington than in London, the mix is authoritative and the equality ideological. never was it said America was concerned with the well being of all of us, and the attitude of the American public is logical. The politics is therefore an approach to liberalism, and there are many. The socialism found in Europe is hated and the distribution of wealth American.

The future lies in global economics, not a question of politics, but the calculation of declining resources and the approach to attitudes. The atlantic does the opposite and is resented by the European political ideological undercurrents. Westminster believes in a solution, and Paris a third way, this kind of division is not Washington's invention, but may be used by it. The atlantic is therefore a global structure and a decision based on globalisation. The problem is no-one likes being told to be disciplined, and Washington is reactive in this way.

The atlantic is globalisation to elites, but machines can divert political strategies and geography can change confident approaches based on background and socialisation. I suggest machines are shapes , a kind political star with six points. The problem is no-ne can agree on their direction. I suggest one is the church and is unknown at the moment. Another the bureaucracy and a third the local structures. The atlantic therefore is about learning, not action and this seems to be a European lead.

The television is of course a shape, the educational establishment. Unfortunately some countries don't tell you how it works. But the politics is of course unpredictable with a sharp division in Europe. The Mitterrand years were infamous in Paris for the joke, I seem to remember Chirac predicting his victory on the radio. But globalisation aside, the atlantic is no longer a way forward for European elites. The politics of Washington are therefore divisive and the economics more of a scientific test of virility. The politics will be a disaster, but for some countries that does not matter!