The EU built our motorways and our bridges and money was paid from the EU in structural funds to accomplish it. An approach of integration and a resort to blackmail, but also a way of getting around British budget discipline. The British budget did similar things for the EU and the recent events show that separation is not easy and can last a minimum number of years. The problem is building and decay and the future is construction and surplus. The budget has always been observed publicly and the the moeny from our pensions was earmarked for Britain, not other EU countries. The new budget will have to raise taxes and the direction will be left not right, because money is flowing outwards.
The integration of the UK is not regarded in a EU method, but Scotland is mindful of British taxes spent on their position. The south is less interested, the City is going down with disintegration and the investment is going into a split method of location. More money will go European because of enlargement and adjustment to British localism. The money for the English has to be reallocated to pension support and employment creation, in the the Thatcher years money fled. Hence the UK is reallocated taxes that are not there, and the EU is finding it a bad future portfolio.
I argue Boris. Johnson has a foreign perspective on disintegration as did the UK on Scotland. The EU budget is not a social budget, it is political and economic, so Britain with its expansive social policy will loose out when disintegration takes place. The money on agriculture is political, as is new kinds of industrial organisation. The EU has no city, but inhibits identity that suggests this is the case, Britain will hang its head in shame if it is a city depression. The future of employment needs to change to overcome these obstacles, and only this will be enough. Hardly monetarism, and suggests reliance on social issues.
The global picture is also unsettling, the power of the institutions is directed domestically and towards Europe, and the profit is ideological and top heavy, dependent on foreign bonus culture and it suggests domestic policy sillier than in the 1930s. The democracy has been an ideological tool in Europe and undermined economic principles. The sustainability of ideology against neighbours that can't access your markets is hopeless. The critical juncture is economic, not political and is not being understood. No oil, no domestic industry and taxation hss a low turnout position that is enough to sink the policy.
Tuesday, October 03, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The growth
The system of inertia is a strong isolator in the health industry, the identity of the service important and the wealth of advice and direct...
-
The tool of wars is publicity and the background of globalisation is growth. Brexit appears to be a problem for Europe and Russia and its en...
-
The Conservative leader is famous for his actions in Iran and Russia, and Labour encourages belief in the politics of Hamas. The social sid...
-
The independence process is a short one, and American elections are hazardous and dangerous affairs. Donald Trump is a seasoned campaigner a...