The old coming into new dawn

The threat of China is against the principles of organisation, it suggests local power and capitalist influence, the threat is organisational and risk averse. I argue the new dawn is a China with nuclear weapons from client states. The opposition is framework and discipline and the leaders would prefer ideology. The visit by Trump was well timed and the result has reverberations in Europe. The risk is our divisions and the danger a lack of military resolve. China is not democratic or principled and its leader a solvent of the Communist hierarchy. The risk is to identity and the opening a resource of local authority.

Was Trump right to visit? The continuity shown by pro western sentiments is worrying, the honesty of Chinese leaders will be compared to western ones. The principle is identity and the ideology a way to manipulate home shores. Why does China matter, it has a rebellious nature and a solvent of its institutions which are violent and treacherous. The leaders may be immune from total responsibility and their opposition takes the blame. How do identity crises undermine threat. Only for economic reasons.

The new dawn is not Deng replaced, it is norms reestablished and government transvested.  We will become one of those islands in the sand, a sort of death that requires foreign destruction and political equality. Lets look at some alternatives. Destroy Chinese nuclear weapons, regionalise the outbreak of hostility of risk principles in the east. The new dawn is Chinese and only the leadership identifies with it. Undermine frameworks and you will get growth. The new dawn has less chance of success than distant onlookers think, and a powerful alliance of UK and America seems to bode well.

The Chinese are not only in China, Taiwan is Chinese. The threat is from diasporas and identifying social hegemony. The globe is growth not political relationships, but leaders must remind themselves of the USSR and forget notions of Cold War supremacy. The power is framework, the context Russia and America, and this puts the UK in a dangerous position. All could be lost by us and this has implications of a Cold War with China excluding Russia. The politics is risk and ideology. the reverse is continuity, China is an acorn and can't be rebranded.