The system of peasants

The system is not ideological, the purpose is to use and exert will over politics and undermine reform to traditions and statements like religion or family cohesion. The argument is to undermine the reformers and fascilitate those who dislike community and shared beliefs. This is confusing, the politics looks like it from the outside, like left and right it is an older form, a kind of social uprising based on rules and understandings. It is not so much an expereince as a belief in something beyond the norm.

I undermine the beliefs by joining recent movements and threatening continuity. The challenge is to frame those around you and strengthen local ties. Why? It starts a movement and risks ignoring central and unpopular powers. The UK was threatened in the colonies and France has been in recent terrorist incidents. The politics may be northern, but it comes form a kind of 60s mentality that right is known and  leaders are useless.

The local spirit is important for the movement and the centre feels its is comical. But traditions are based on it and France has an agricultural base like this. The peasants reject the validity of lives outside this framework and the animals are often worshiped. The social movement is an economic entity, based on power it pays through contributions as community structures insert. The terrorits may have had their own aims, but would have has an education in this kind of belief system.

The politics of the UK is different, but social movements do exist and political parties appear to be strengthening their reach. The government needs to realise that victims have collateral, and although their structures continue, their leaders do not. The arabs have similar movements as in Egypt. But they do not cross international frontiers except through education. Like the colonisers, we will be threatened by these movements even from beyond our shores. I suggest we assert rationality and impose authority in education.