The sentinel

The ideologist is not the framework he was supposed to be, a mere fellow that didn't mean what he said, and how they interpreted it. His opposing structure is the sentinel, a kind of risk fulfilment the needed or lacked something to give. The ideology wasn't his identity, but for the sentinel it became a kind of threat. The framework needed someone to live in it and the goal is a decline in social approach. The sentinel requires a dagger, something to play with and to change his boredom. The problem lies in isolation, and the future a reverse thrust into arrival.

The first step was a goal to enliven his friends, a reverse of the solution he lacked. The bottom of his hierarchy undermined the goal of living better, and the decline froze his eyes. The attempt had been to frame his opponent, and a goal that heightened his sense of security, the background was important and only foresight could return the gift. The future of decision-making is not in words, fiction and brave acts  encompass it.

Decline is a understatement, and risk to his friends and a happy ending to a fairytale. The decision is less a way of meeting people than a frame to put your mugs in. I suggest the risk s a approach to solutions, as a way out of false paths and innuendo. The path is laden with false identities and social misgiving and the point a way out of political meaning. The sentinel is a goal of the mind, and a decline of the senses, the ideologist should have been a painter. The future is a method of reversing time and a sorting of the misunderstanding.

The difficulty with ideology is its a image and sentinels also have that quality. Don't remind us of the goal, it is an image of the mind. The meaning is underrepresented in political satire, and social reverse. The planning is rhetorical and the scenery real, but the wandering have. a way of fitting both sense and. sensibility. The issues are not social, and the political is a fail, the ideologist must shape hie destine not through decisions, but political satire.

The goal isn also one of those words, not a meaning of memory or calculation, and a frame of images that have the air of a gallery. Sentinel and ideologist were thought to have thoughts in common, neither wanted personal touch, and calculation was triadic. The image is a background like a cloth and the framework a sort of misspent youth and social idea. The goal than was not real, and fighting misrepresented, the goal a Camus victory and the idea just too good to be true.

The footnote is a solution and I suggest the political is an answer. The division a kind of calculation and the origin a sort of misrepresentation, an image and a meaning for those involved.