The risk

The threat to institutions comes from the risk its inhabitants face in search of the truth in their lives, not the organisation of power in the attempt at reaching equal status to other residents. The risk is the nature of the individual, not the cause of the problem and the power of the inmates is not measured by the events they go through. I argue the influence is the construction of authority and how you challenge it, not the nature or meaning of it in objective terms. The institution is an external position in relation to interests and the structure of ideology.

The elderly face uphill tasks in their self appraisal of the face others give them. I suggest that the reach of the institution has no bearing, but the power of individual members has a status impact on their lives and not the meaning they attach to them. The institution is a possibility, an image, not a disability and the influence of staff similar to bathing or finding help in terms of meetings and clothing. The risk is in challenging other views of those around them on these points and not in the daily tasks done for them. Accidents are of meaningful translation, not the risk to the institution.

The elderly face problems of relatives, do staff recognise their rights in implementing the threat to those who challenge them. I agree that staff have rights, but how can they be the same entities? The reach of the institution is in the outside, a world that can challenge definitions and the influence of fascilities for recognition. I suggest these are personal, and the elderly face extremities of threat and comfort in this way. The other point is cognition, and institutions are relevant to internal cognition as well as structural types.

The problem for the elderly is not this meaning, but the external impact of long-term effects. This is the institution's public face and meaning is not recognised. The latter is why the elderly do not decide to change their situation. By public and private faces I mean the social impact of institutional methods. The risk to institution is great, but the power of politics much higher on institutional to do lists. The elderly risk being undermined by this organisation, and the power of groups is set to challenge these definitions in objective interests.

UK's relationship

Chinese politics is based on risk, the visit by its President to the UK was a political signal to its elite that the centralisation of policy would continue. The Commonwealth is based on trade, but its centralisation is a political not policy signal. The visit reassured Huang that the UK had no interests in its region, the UK was more concerned with presitige and trade, an agreement was in Chinese interests. Centralised policty means closed borders and territorial integrity. The UK has interests in nuclear fuel because of low prices and the hope of access to markets in the far east.

The India dimension is fairly straightforward, India is a regional power and the UK has historical prestige in a close relationship with it. China is a friend which has no social comparison to the UK and the UK likes to invest resources on its territory, because of cheap labour and low regulation. The power relationship is less easy. The power in India is in structures, not institutions, the UK would like to exploit these links. China is in a similar position to the UK, and India has an historical power division in this area. The ideology is in structures and will the UK harm either country's interests.

Foreign policy is a structure and power an institutional division. I suggest China fears the UK history in the region, but has not assessed UK political culture and India is mindful of domestic interests looking towards new ties and not old benefactors. In other words the UK will not be a policy interest. China has centralised institutions, and structure is a regional battleground. The Chinese will wonder why the UK chose this moment, I suggest China has been reluctant. The visits to London by India and Chinese leaders are evidence of a reconciliatry move.

The UK policy is in trade through Europe and Japan, sometimes difficult for UK audiences. India and China may have political points, but trade depends on sea routes and trade deals not political demands. China understands this and is ready for a UK deal, will our suppliers trust it. India is less ready to concede its economic reach, possibly because of experience in dealing with the UK. Centralisation and regional power are important in these dynamics. The risk is China doesn't need the UK, and UK needs China.