The model of democracy

The politics of the economy means states and societies are larger than life, the nation something positive and  reduced fear of the state. Societies are social in realism, and framed by economic statistics. The model of the nation is a construct from these perspectives, I argue the model in Russia is similar to elsewhere, but the region and identity of citizens are not.

The Chinese model is redistributive, because of globalisation, and sent to war with the west by American exploitation. The model is intransitive, and it undermines democratic principles because of it. The region has agricultural and historical problems, but the model does not show all of them. The Trump visit was a fact finding tour, and lot redistribution in its assessment.e

The French model is solving regional aims, and this bites back. The state is cornered by decline in certain industries. The framework is social in aim and forensic in nature, and the model changes according to social principles and economic targets. The reduction in the goals and ambitions of institutions is because of a declining Germany and social targets are solutions.

Russia attacked Syria for political ams at home and economies became advantageous to the mother. The region has economic targets like expanding industry, and failure is not accepted. The reason is historical and political. The consequence is shoring up the home against foreign invaders.

The model of democracy has never been comparative, but the decline is misrepresented in these terms. I suggest we examine the model as a reason for growth, because it adapts to norms and local directions in nationhood. The model of course is not democratic, and this is a drawback. I suggest we try the imagined space and the institutional rules asa way to unblock the switch.