The ignorance question

Trump appears to have let political strategy to take over, and the news from Washington says it has worked. I argue the system is becoming accuse your opponent, not recognise his virtues and debate policy. Certainly both candidates are lacking on this score. I suggest the recent accusation that ignorance counts is below the belt, especially from a black President, because he allows this discussion to escalate to a gender clash and political intrigue. I point out that black and white were his credentials, not yellow and green.

But the debate raises larger issues. The south is Hilary's search for votes and three east more Trump's. I point to the welfare question, and the black disenfranchisement, even the 1960s and how black people were denied the vote. The answer is this dirty contest has been blaimed on Trump, when Hilary has everything to gain from it. The government must be questioning the strategy because the debate is divided and the politics is outside agreements. The President has been drawn in to a discussion he should be involved in, but has less origins of this sort than some of his contemporaries.

The strategy is a double one, both believe in the superiority of the elected and Hilary has been in both black led governments and social issues on the left. Trump has more to offer the black community in the southern areas and is vulnerable on the issue. Hilary is privileged, and Trump is wealthy. The Irish issue has failed to resonate and both camps are divided on the merits of raising left issues and black labels after Obama.

Presidents that are black have a link to Cuban and immigration, Trump is cool on both. Hilary was Secretary of State and claims legitimacy in this area. The division than is about helping candiadtes, should Obama side with Hilary, has global media made a black essential for this politics. A black President has a legacy, and the truth is Trump is on the moral side. The state supports elections that are funded by donors, Trumps wealth is an issue and ignoranace often a solution to giving money to candidates. I argue it is money and back that are fuelling the controversey and Trump has much to gain from it.