The origins of ideology

The social context of immigration is political instrumentation, I suggest the recent politics in France is not a Franco-British issue, it is a social one. The framework is a decisive break with political history, a setting of world influence and a solution neither governmnet can tolerate. The political instruments are the public and the reason a bias towards social threat.

The immigrants from Syria are also a target of drug smugglers and political pundits, but the politics
is economic and the causes the EU. The aim is to destabilise UK support, but the causes have a social dimension. The refugees believe Europe has their interests and the truth is there is no power behind it. The government uses immigration without critical comment, and the refugees have no voice. They do not have to be the new issue, but David Cameron wants a political approach to them.

The history is of Syrian demise and no-one discusses their background or status, we know they will not succeed. The decisons have been taken and the politics is of blame and accusation, not welcome and efficiency. The decison is a framework of economic implication, we are not monetarists and discuss unemployment as a far reaching ideology. Thy know they will have the votes and immigrants are unpopular and excluded.

Responsibility we see in the crowds, and desert in the children, but they are not decisive in their social approach. Refugees are never easily protected, but the onslaught on the vulnerable wasn't the guides or the refugee leaders. The goal is to end immigration, where does economic status leave the UK in this situation. No low paid jonbs open to anyone and trade divided along political not economic dimensions. This background is framed by a spin, if you say it enough times they will believe it. Bad economic sense does not improve their future.

The resort to obscurity is no longer a decision taken by economic organisations, the social approach is decisive, how does politics operate in a vacuum, by manipulating those who cannot answer back. The economic is of course not a political event and the resort to decisive action not aimed at refugees. The decison is a frame of decline not a answer to goals or threat. The decision is a frame of globalisation, but the refugees do not benefit. Who will from this government? This language is used in the conversation between governments, and the politics is a resort to goals that have no depth.