Terror in northern cities

The economic crisis has undermined cities of growth, the direction of terrorism is crisis and the rural has become a centre of derision. This division is social in terms of age and political in its framework. I suggest tailored goals require understanding that is undermined. Manchester's bomb is a religious risk and the point is it is not a political one. The economic question has also undermined the nature of the religious division, solutions are negative and causes traditional. The rural makes it social in communities as a movement and the urban is divisive.

The terror is in northern economic endeavours and the goals are generational. The politics is decentralisation and the opposition closely involved with identity. The solution a growing sense of frustration with the political pressure, but the economics is decentered and decentralisation is goal led. I suggest the solution needs to match a direction fit for goals not politics. This means social is interactive and solving is goal reverse. As in city politics solutions appear undermined and inertia and growing city economies is housing and immigration.

The two geographical areas are economically different and politically. The urban has housing problems similar to other cities and rural spaces are unitary because of their framework, such as schools. The direction is goals and the psychology political. The frameworks are solitary and the politics derision and terrorism is in a vacuum. The idea is goals are unifying and frameworks set. The  basis is politics and the goals unifying. The settings economic and solution development.